🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Movement

Across Europe, a rising group of states are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". A law could be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an similar ban could be "a potential measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory resolution demanding a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is provided. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a good starting point," commented a leading MEP supporting the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "based on robust evidence".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. One foundation set up by the family of a young person who died after being exposed to dangerous platform posts suggests that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to design tools that are secure and suitable for young users," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the local government level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills mandating parental consent for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some figures to follow the Australian example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Outside of these regions, additional states are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international agencies take a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve user protection.

As this global debate unfolds, the policies of this nation and its followers show that policymakers internationally are increasingly willing to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.