🔗 Share this article

The resident Tomas Anez Dos Santos toiled in a tiny open space far in the of Peru rainforest when he heard sounds approaching through the thick woodland.

It dawned on him he was surrounded, and halted.

“One person stood, directing using an projectile,” he remembers. “Unexpectedly he detected of my presence and I started to run.”

He ended up encountering members of the Mashco Piro. Over many years, Tomas—dwelling in the modest community of Nueva Oceania—served as almost a neighbor to these itinerant tribe, who reject engagement with foreigners.

A recent study from a human rights organisation claims remain a minimum of 196 termed “uncontacted groups” remaining globally. The Mashco Piro is believed to be the largest. It claims 50% of these tribes may be decimated in the next decade should administrations neglect to implement further actions to defend them.

It argues the biggest risks are from deforestation, extraction or operations for petroleum. Uncontacted groups are extremely at risk to basic disease—therefore, the study notes a danger is presented by interaction with evangelical missionaries and digital content creators seeking engagement.

In recent times, members of the tribe have been coming to Nueva Oceania with greater frequency, according to inhabitants.

The village is a angling community of seven or eight families, perched elevated on the shores of the Tauhamanu River in the heart of the Peruvian Amazon, 10 hours from the nearest town by boat.

The area is not classified as a safeguarded zone for isolated tribes, and deforestation operations operate here.

Tomas says that, at times, the sound of heavy equipment can be detected day and night, and the community are observing their forest damaged and destroyed.

In Nueva Oceania, people report they are torn. They are afraid of the Mashco Piro's arrows but they also possess deep admiration for their “brothers” who live in the forest and want to safeguard them.

“Let them live in their own way, we must not change their traditions. That's why we maintain our distance,” explains Tomas.

Residents in Nueva Oceania are concerned about the harm to the community's way of life, the danger of violence and the likelihood that timber workers might subject the community to diseases they have no immunity to.

During a visit in the village, the tribe appeared again. Letitia Rodriguez Lopez, a woman with a toddler daughter, was in the forest gathering fruit when she heard them.

“We heard cries, cries from others, many of them. Like there were a whole group calling out,” she informed us.

It was the first time she had come across the Mashco Piro and she ran. After sixty minutes, her thoughts was persistently pounding from fear.

“Since operate timber workers and companies cutting down the woodland they are fleeing, possibly due to terror and they end up close to us,” she explained. “It is unclear how they will behave to us. This is what scares me.”

Recently, a pair of timber workers were assaulted by the Mashco Piro while angling. A single person was hit by an bow to the gut. He recovered, but the second individual was discovered lifeless days later with multiple arrow wounds in his frame.

The administration follows a policy of non-contact with secluded communities, rendering it prohibited to commence interactions with them.

The policy originated in the neighboring country following many years of advocacy by community representatives, who noted that early exposure with isolated people lead to entire groups being wiped out by sickness, hardship and hunger.

In the 1980s, when the Nahau tribe in the country first encountered with the broader society, 50% of their community died within a matter of years. During the 1990s, the Muruhanua tribe faced the similar destiny.

“Isolated indigenous peoples are extremely vulnerable—epidemiologically, any interaction may transmit diseases, and including the simplest ones might decimate them,” states a representative from a Peruvian indigenous rights group. “In cultural terms, any contact or intrusion can be very harmful to their life and well-being as a community.”

For local residents of {