🔗 Share this article

Turns out Ruben Amorim endured losing against Grimsby. He weathered an important European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, undermining some of the club’s most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. The most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Regarding Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority In the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “will be decided by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Whom else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Soccer Order: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to join a club and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have these guys set up? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet finally accountable if it arrives poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach and then dismiss him for playing too much 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and then bin him for taking too long. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.